Dispensing rate after an eye test is the number that pays
- 3 days ago
- 3 min read
Introduction
The sight test is frequently sold at or below the cost of providing it. What makes an optical practice work is the proportion of tested patients who then buy spectacles or lenses, and the value of what they buy. A practice testing forty patients a week at a 55% dispensing rate is a materially different business from one at 75%, on identical footfall and identical clinical work.
Most practices know their dispensing rate approximately and have never examined where the other patients go. The answer is usually a small number of specific moments between the chair and the frame display, and each of them is fixable without any additional marketing spend.
1. Dispensing rate after an eye test is a handover problem
The clinical room and the dispensing floor are two different businesses to the patient, and the join is where people leave.
Measure it per optometrist and per day
Tests conducted against dispenses completed, over a quarter. The variation between optometrists on the same floor is usually the most informative number in the practice.
Watch the walk from chair to display
A patient who leaves the consulting room without being introduced to anybody is deciding on their own. Being handed to a named dispensing optician changes the outcome measurably.
2. The prescription conversation sets up the sale
What happens in the consulting room decides what happens outside it, and most of that is explanation.
Explain what has changed and why it matters
A patient who understands that their prescription has altered has a reason to buy. One who is told it is "much the same" has been given a reason to wait another two years.
Recommend specifically, not generally
Naming the lens type the patient actually needs, and why, is clinical advice. Leaving it as a general suggestion turns it into an optional extra they can decline at the till.
3. Second pairs are where the value sits
Most practices have a single-pair habit and a two-pair opportunity, and the difference is whether anyone raises it.
Ask about the second use case
Driving, screen work, reading, sunglasses. Patients own one pair because nobody asked what else they do, not because they only need one.
Make the second pair easy to say yes to
A clear price for a second pair, decided in advance, removes the negotiation. An unstated discount invites a conversation nobody enjoys.
4. Follow up the patients who left without buying
A test with no dispense is a warm contact, not a closed case.
Record why they did not buy
Price, time, wanted to think, buying online. Four categories, recorded at the door, tell you which problem you actually have within a month.
Contact them within a fortnight
A short call while the prescription is fresh recovers a reasonable share. After two months they have bought elsewhere.
5. Recall is the whole business
Dispensing rate compounds with attendance, and attendance is a system rather than a hope.
Make the recall reliable
Two contacts, on different channels, at the right interval. Practices that treat recall casually see their dispensing volume fall regardless of their conversion.
Use the recall to set expectations
Mentioning that prescriptions change and that a second pair may be sensible, before they arrive, does part of the work in advance.
Conclusion
Measure tests against dispenses per optometrist over a quarter, then watch what happens in the walk from the consulting room to the frames — that handover is where most of the loss sits.
Explain what has changed in the prescription and recommend the lens specifically rather than generally, ask every patient what else they do so the second pair gets raised, set a clear second-pair price in advance, record a reason for every patient who leaves without buying, contact them within a fortnight, and treat recall as the system the whole practice depends on.
.png)



Comments