top of page

Pricing a survey by risk rather than size of the property

  • 3 days ago
  • 3 min read

Introduction


Most survey fee scales are built on floor area or purchase price, because both are easy to look up and easy to quote from. Neither predicts the work. A large modern house with clear access and no alterations is a straightforward inspection; a small Victorian terrace with a cellar, a rear extension of unknown provenance, a flat roof and no access to the loft is not.

Nor does size predict professional exposure. The claims risk on a survey sits in what might have been missed, and the properties most likely to hide something are frequently the smallest and oldest. Those are the ones fee scales underprice most.

Pricing on risk and complexity rather than area brings the fee into line with both the effort and the liability. It also stops the easy jobs subsidising the difficult ones.


1. Pricing a survey by risk rather than size starts with the factors that drive work


Identify what actually consumes time.


Age and construction type


Period properties, non-standard construction, timber frame, system build. Each requires more inspection and carries more to report. Pre-1919 stock behaves differently from anything later.


Alterations and extensions


Anything altered without visible documentation takes longer to assess and generates more caveats. Ask whether any work had approval.


Access constraints


No loft hatch, boarded floors, locked outbuildings, restricted external access. Each one adds caveats to the report. Limited inspection means more careful reporting. It also means more follow-up questions afterwards.


2. Build a scale with a complexity loading


Keep it simple enough to quote from.


Start from a base by survey level


Your standard fee for a straightforward property at each level. Cost it from your own recorded time.


Add a stated percentage for named factors


Listed status, non-standard construction, extensive alterations, more than three storeys. Published rather than negotiated. Put the loadings on your own terms.


3. Quote after asking, not before


Two minutes of questions prevents most underpricing.


Ask about age, alterations and access


Before giving a figure. Buyers answer readily and the answers change the price. Three questions is enough.


Ask what concerns them


A buyer worried about damp or subsidence is telling you where the work will be. That is worth knowing before quoting. It also shapes the report they want.


4. Price the professional risk honestly


This is the part fee scales usually ignore.


Reflect indemnity cost in the fee


Professional indemnity for survey work is a significant annual cost driven by the risk you carry. It belongs in every fee. Divide the annual premium by surveys completed.


Be willing to decline


Some properties are not worth surveying at any sensible fee. Saying no is a legitimate commercial decision. Recommend a specialist instead.


5. Review the scale against recorded time


Fee scales drift out of alignment quietly.


Record time per survey by property type


Site time, report writing, follow-up queries. Record all three separately. Within a few months the pattern is clear. Group by age band rather than by size.


Adjust annually


Costs, indemnity premiums and property stock all change. A scale set three years ago is probably wrong somewhere. Put the review in the diary.


Conclusion


Floor area predicts neither the time on site nor the professional exposure, so price on what actually drives work: age and construction type, undocumented alterations, and access constraints that limit what you can inspect.

Build a base fee by survey level with a published percentage loading for named factors — listed status, non-standard construction, extensive alteration — rather than negotiating each one. Ask about age, alterations and access before quoting anything, and ask what the buyer is worried about, because that tells you where the work will be. Reflect indemnity cost in every fee, be willing to decline properties that cannot be surveyed at a sensible price, and review the scale annually against recorded time.


Related reading


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page